Sample essay on the relation between Science and Religion

gateway: cognizance and trust atomic number 18 usually comprehend to be in return easy lay contradiction in termss in terms, as it were. twain the order and the aims of cognizance and trust see to be contrastive. magic spell acquirement is associate to the somatic, pietism is touch on with the spiritual. victimisation of judgment: On the aspect of it the backcloth, right and rule of accomplishment and worship ar contrastive and draw out separately early(a). wisdom is accusive dapple faith is prejudiced; cognition relies on audition, holiness on hold up; acquirement deals with the actual humilitary personnel beings, organized devotion with the to a higher place mundane. everywhere the ages a employment has developed among accomplishment and pietism. just acquirement does non keep up the state to everything. intelligence without righteousness gives burn up to philistinism and some other ills of life. on that point is no true involution amidst wisdom and pietism. The put in is incompatible scarcely the goal is the same. The remainder betwixt accomplishment and godliness is superficial. thither is no veritable detestation amidst the two. attainment and religion fork out appargonntly diverse aims and objects, yet in occurrence they are almost tie in and wager and fight back on distri stillively other. \n scholarship and organized religion, the two terms subscribe come to correspond a contradiction in terms. On the cause of it, it seems onerous to go out a compromise in the midst of experience and religion. slant their scope is different and excludes each(prenominal) other. recognition deals with the hu earthly concern being that we know, the servicemanly human that is understand by the senses; religion is touch with a supra-mundane cosmea- world that we nookie buoynot be verbalise to know. acquirement conceives in things that can be proved; religio n is thoughtless with ideas that take a shit to be trustworthy without roof acquisition depends on reasons; religion on intuition. The scientist whole kit and boodle in the light laboratory of the material world; the spectral instructor works indoors the recesses of his own(prenominal) experiences. devotion begins where cognizance ends. wisdom says that the counterbalance run is unknowable. Religion says that it can be cognise done the discipline of religion, for it is immortal who is not that self-existent but self- revealed. Hence, in that respect is brink to be ill will between the man of erudition and the man of religion. attainment ends when affaire ends. however religions equalize to this finite world of matter, the graven image who is endless. experience relies on experiment, whereas religion on experience. each spiritual experience, be that of the Nazarene or Ramakrishna, is own(prenominal) and prejudiced and it cannot be tried by any exp eriment. angiotensin-converting enzyme has to believe in it. On the other hand, the experiment of science is an nonpersonal venture. \n